Greffière, Et lors du délibéré, par : - Madame Viviane CAULLIREAU-FOREL, Conseillère faisant fonction de Présidente, à ces fins désignée par ordonnance de Madame la Première Présidente - Monsieur Edouard

    Moreover, in light of the above considerations, and in particular given the clear and extensive case-law on the topic, the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the

The Court’s task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair ( Edwards v. the United Kingdom , judgment of 6 December 1992, Series

It has further concluded that the national law cannot be regarded as being sufficiently clear, precise or detailed to have afforded appropriate protection against arbitrary interference by the authorities

Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that

Belgium , 22 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 235-B, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B). 12.

He made it clear that further information sought by the defence counsel was not going to be revealed by him. It was also made clear that the interception tape and transcripts had been destroyed.

[N] [Z] clos au 31 aout 2010.

That was simply to clear one matter up; it could have occupied no more than about ten seconds out of a speech lasting 45 minutes or thereabouts, we are told. That complaint is unjustified.

It concluded that although the judge fell into error in excluding the evidence, having heard the evidence it was clear that it would not have materially advanced the defence case at trial.

concerned three applications originally lodged by ten French nationals, Mrs   Marie-Jeanne Chassagnou, Mr René PETIT, Mrs Simone LASGREZAS, Mr Léon DUMONT, Mr Pierre GALLAND, Mr André GALLAND, Mr Edouard

Yves Le Forestier, demeurant 27, rue du Clos Neuf, 22360 Langueux, 52 / de M. Nicolas Le Gal, demeurant lotissement Halory, 22590 Tréméloir, 53 / de M.

The SCC noted the comportment of each accused during the interview, finding it clear that each accused was “deliberately and, indeed, offensively” ignoring all that was being asked of them.

However, it became clear from the context that it had used the term in the sense of “encourage”.

Belgium , 22   April 1992, Series   A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 32, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, §   34).

procedural obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of a detainee (see, among many other authorities, Paul and Audrey Edwards

It was clear to the court that each was deliberately and offensively ignoring all that was being asked of them.

       Application No. 13071/87                       by Derek EDWARDS

Furthermore, the Court observes that the declaration contains a clear acknowledgment of a breach of Articles   6   §   1   and 13 of the Convention.