CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13575
25 janvier 2022
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0901DEC002348612
1 septembre 2015
ECLI:CEDH:002-11854
30 janvier 2018
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-13034
10 novembre 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0308DEC006814413
8 mars 2022
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0921DEC002086321
21 septembre 2022
ECLI:CEDH:002-12199
15 mai 2018
ECLI:CEDH:002-13224
23 mars 2021
ECLI:CEDH:002-12143
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130DEC007705614
time has been violated may claim compensation in the domestic courts under the Compensation Act within six months of the new Law’s entry into force, provided that the Court has not ruled on the admissibility
ECLI:CEDH:002-13061
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0603DEC001921907
3 juin 2014
    The main element contained in the new admissibility criterion is the question of whether the applicant has suffered a “significant disadvantage”.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13875
18 octobre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC006539713
3 mai 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416DEC004935822
16 avril 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC004430113
25 mars 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020DEC007159117
20 octobre 2020
    In proceedings before the Court, there are no procedural barriers to the admissibility of evidence or pre-determined formulae for its assessment.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13058
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC002922211
27 janvier 2015
applicant’s complaint about the domestic court’s alleged failure to have recourse to the case-file of the criminal proceedings against H., the Court reiterates that it has repeatedly held that the admissibility
ECLI:CEDH:002-13699
24 mai 2022
Page 13 sur 1885