6 § 1 of the Convention, have been established in respect of various Chambers of the Supreme Court: the Disciplinary Chamber (see   Reczkowicz v.

    The applicants complained under Articles 3, 4, 5, and 13 of the Convention that their relatives had been abducted and had been unlawfully detained in captivity by members of separatist forces

    The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of a violation of their right to a hearing by an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law” since their civil

6 of the Convention.

The applicants complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the length of proceedings. The applications were communicated to the Government.

Vu : - la convention en vue d'éviter les doubles impositions en matière d'impôts sur le revenu et sur la fortune signée le 20 juin 1975 à Varsovie entre le gouvernement de la République française et

of Article 5 paras. 4 and 5 of the Convention.

    Has there been a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and/or Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the applicants’ inability to enforce the final judgments

(l’article   5   § 3 de la Convention) 20.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 7.

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L'ARTICLE 6 § 1 DE LA CONVENTION 19.

de Varsovie ; Que la société DHL en déduit, que n'ayant pas élevé de protestation par réserve écrite et remise ou expédiée dans le délai de 21 jours prescrit à l'article 31 de la Convention de Montréal

Serbia 22/04/2017 Miodrag DRAŠKIĆ 1972 Vršac Serbian Dragan TODOROVIĆ Article 6 of the Convention Article 13 of the Convention Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 12. 34317/17 Đorđević v.

EN DROIT Les requérants invoquent l’article 6 § 1 de la Convention et se plaignent de la longueur excessive de deux procédures.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 The Court reiterates that the right to a tribunal protected by Article   6 would be illusory if

Their attention was drawn to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention. On the dates specified in the appendix, the applicants received that letters.

The applicants complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the length of proceedings. The applications were communicated to the Government.

Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicant alleges that his right of access to a court was violated due to the Constitutional Court’s above-mentioned decisions dismissing both his requests for

    Lastly, citing Article 13 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 2 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the applicant reiterated his dissatisfaction with the relevant authorities’ refusal