Summary of the facts   The case concerns the police’s entry into the restaurant belonging to the applicants and the first applicant’s arrest and subsequent deprivation of liberty.

applicant complied with the six-month period under Article   35 § 1 of the Convention, taking into account the judicial review in respect of the Orders that served as the legal basis for the police’s

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to it, the applicants complain that the respondent State failed to assist them in obtaining enforcement of the final judgments in their favour, and in particular about the police’s

  FIFTH SECTION Application no. 24201/17 Igor Volodymyrovych PANKOV against Ukraine lodged on 23 March 2017 communicated on 5 June 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the police’s

qu'il a été victime de personnes dangereuses et qu'il craint pour sa vie en cas de retour au Pakistan où y règne une violence aveugle - et les observations de Mme C, représentante de la préfecture de policen

On 10 June 2010 the Avtozavodsky District Court upheld the decision to dismiss the applicant, noting that his conduct had been harmful to the police’s reputation.

W., the policeman who had served as an interpreter during the applicant's examination by the police.   Asked whether the applicant had been told to confess, Mr.

    The policeman Mr B. confirmed his earlier statement that Mr   Kaburov had stumbled and fallen down while getting out of his car (see paragraph 9 above).

Another officer, M., also questioned as a witness, stated that the applicant had shouted something and thrown a stone or a piece of tarmac at a policeman. 35 .

It had been clear to the applicant that the police’s order had been aimed at preventing arrangements of altercations with other hooligan groups.

[R] [W] [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] représenté par Me Anne POLICELLA, avocat au barreau de LILLE, substitué par Me Théo WATHELET, avocat au barreau de LILLE DÉBATS : à l'audience publique du 14

Assistée de par Me Ghislain HANICOTTE, avocat au barreau de LILLE INTIMÉ Monsieur [N] [S] né le [Date naissance 1] 1974 - de nationalité Française demeurant : [Adresse 1] Représenté par Me Anne POLICELLA

The applicant is a policeman by profession. On 1   April   1993 he was arrested by the police on suspicion of aiding and abetting in homicide.

Convention, the applicant called into question the acquittal of 29 December 2017 of her former husband for the alleged attack on her with his vehicle, and also more generally complained about the police’s

The Revenue Police’s investigations 2 .

The prosecutors dismissed her requests, endorsing the police’s conclusion that the conflicts had been mutual.

Janez Zupanc, est un ressortissant slovène, né en 1978 et résidant à Polzela. Il est représenté devant la Cour par le cabinet d'avocats Verstovšek de Celje.

JUGEMENT DU 02 OCTOBRE 2025 ENTRE : DEMANDEUR Monsieur [Y] [B] né le 06 Octobre 1942 à [Localité 5], demeurant [Adresse 1] représenté par Maître David ROGUET de la SELARL GUMUSCHIAN ROGUET BONZY POLZELLA

JUGEMENT DU 02 OCTOBRE 2025 ENTRE : DEMANDEUR Monsieur [W] [R] né le 21 Mai 1962 à [Localité 5], demeurant [Adresse 3] représenté par Maître David ROGUET de la SELARL GUMUSCHIAN ROGUET BONZY POLZELLA