Türkiye 28/09/2021 Osman YILDIRIM 1983 Manisa Turkish 123. 49340/21 Tüysüz v. Türkiye 24/09/2021 Emre TÜYSÜZ 1981 Bursa Turkish 124. 49403/21 Kanal v.

Where possessions which have been used unlawfully are confiscated, such a balance depends on many factors, which include the property owner’s behaviour ( see Yildirim v.

Türkiye Resul YILDIRIM Awarded 95. 12631/18 Tufan v. Türkiye Fatih TUFAN Awarded 96. 13397/18 Abanoz v. Türkiye Yahya ABANOZ Awarded 97. 13739/18 Şahin v.

Türkiye 19/03/2021 Emrah YILDIRIM 1978 Ankara Turkish Saniye YILDIRIM   17216/21 Dayanır v.

Türkiye 26/11/2021 İlhami YILDIRIM 1972 Istanbul Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR   59184/21 Bilgehan v. Türkiye 29/11/2021 Recep BİLGEHAN 1964 Balıkesir Turkish Furkan BURHAN   59423/21 Özden v.

sAAF48370 { width:22.55pt; display:inline-block } .sF52EF7EE { width:229.11pt; display:inline-block }       DEUXIÈME SECTION             AFFAIRE ABDURRAHMAN YILDIRIM

Ordinance no. 23/2008 on fishing and aquaculture) and the very restricted assessment of the second applicant’s fault and conduct in relation to the criminal offence committed by the first applicant (see Yildirim

xa0;    Fikret Onat                             Yildirim

209.32pt; display:inline-block } .s893551A7 { width:37.61pt; display:inline-block } .s6468F78D { width:209.31pt; display:inline-block }     DEUXIÈME SECTION     AFFAIRE MUSTAFA YILDIRIM

#xa0;        6798/09 02/12/2008 Mehmet Çelebi ÇALAN 01/09/1967 Bolu Murat VARGÜN             6804/09 25/11/2008 Ömer YILDIRIM

Does Bulgarian law provide for a possibility for owners of assets, forfeited in criminal proceedings against third parties, to effectively protect their property rights in any other proceedings (see Yildirim

jours d’arrêt simple Du 13 au 14   octobre 2011   ; du 23 au 24   octobre 2011   ; du 29   novembre au 4   décembre 2011   ; du 8 au 13 février 2012 28562/12 Özgür YILDIRIM

{ width:187.97pt; display:inline-block } .s893551A7 { width:37.61pt; display:inline-block } .s89E33FB6 { width:205.97pt; display:inline-block }     DEUXIÈME SECTION     AFFAIRE YILDIRIM

    Başak YILDIRIM est une ressortissante turque née en 1953 et résidant à Adana.

ÇETIN NAFIYE ET AUTRES 07/04/2009 07/07/2009 2858/07 CIGERHUN ONER n o 2 23/11/2010 23/02/2011 22568/05 COŞAR 26/03/2013 26/06/2013 32211/07 CÜNEYT POLAT 13/11/2014 13/02/2015 20562/07 DAĞABAKAN ET YILDIRIM

  the   former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia , no. 19017/16, §§   19-23, 17   May 2018; and Yildirim v. Romania (dec.), no. 21186/02, 20   September 2007)?

201.76pt; display:inline-block } .s294F11C8 { width:3.2pt; display:inline-block } .sE64049FF { width:213.1pt; display:inline-block }     DEUXIÈME SECTION DÉCISION Requête n o 697/10 Oktay YILDIRIM

Yildiray Yilmaz («   le requérant   »), a saisi la Cour le 6 mars 2008 en vertu de l’article   34 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales (« &#

Türkiye 26/04/2019 Engin YILDIRIMER 20/01/1984     23673/19 Ayanoğlu v. Türkiye 24/04/2019 Hüseyin AYANOĞLU 20/11/1972 İhsan MAKAS   23953/19 Arslan v.

While under such circumstances an interference with “family life” might also occur, the matter undoubtedly concerned the applicant’s “private life” (see Yildirim v.