... médecin légiste ; que I... a déclaré avoir été victime de pénétrations digitales et péniennes intravaginales et d'agressions sexuelles entre le 12 et 22 juillet 2014 ; qu'elle a également vu son beau-père

The domestic authorities were better placed to determine what was in the best interests of the children and to take the necessary measures in this respect. 52.

not live together, a court shall decide which parent shall have custody and on the contacts with the other parent. ...”

    In November 1990 the applicant lawfully entered Austria together with his parents and two siblings. Subsequently, he was legally resident in Austria.

The booklet provoked a feeling of pity towards children abandoned by their parents and at the same time it aroused feelings of indignation towards their parents. 27.

prescription devait être fixé à la date de la dernière tentative de remise du solde du prix de la cession, soit au 12 mai 1992, date d'un exploit de saisie-arrêt entre les mains de la banque de Baecque Beau

    On 26 December 2016 the local administration decided to suspend the applicant from his duties as N.’s adoptive parent.

may take adoption leave of 270 continuous days from the date of adoption, provided that the adoptive parent’s spouse is not the child’s biological parent.” 17.

The certificate stated that the child (born in 1993) suffered from bronchial asthma and that he was in need of his parent’s constant care. 9.

A parent exercising parental authority jointly may only change the child’s place of residence with the agreement of the other parent or by a decision of the court or the child protection authority if (

    On 6 June 2007 the applicant’s school brought a claim against him, seeking payment of the fees due.

The privilege of the organiser to decide which location fits best for the purpose of the assembly is part of the very essence of freedom of assembly.

CG’s guardian and GOSH maintained their position that the course of action proposed by the parents was not in CG’s best interests. 26.

He will do his best to protect your interests but must, of course, bear in mind what is best for KP.

That may be so in the case of a parent’s partner/spouse or former partner/spouse who is neither the child’s biological nor legal parent but who takes care of the child or participates in his or her upbringing

payment before that date.” 34.

However, it was of utmost importance that the parents maintained better relations, which would allow a possibility for the child to see her mother more often.

The court would then be in a better position to reach its decision on the question of access.

Parliament has taken the view that no one should have the power to override the need for a genetic parent’s consent.

birth parents.