légal, domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Jean-Philippe AUTIER, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0053 Ayant pour avocat plaidant à l'audience Me Samir

ET COMMERCIAL RCS de PARIS 542 016 381 Prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 2] [Localité 2] Représentée et assistée de Me Jean-Christophe

The protestors continued to engage in the same activities and consequently the police made a total of 13 arrests.   18.

    The Regional Court considered that the same principles applied to the mentioning of the plaintiffs’ names on the website entitled “babycaust.de”.

Christoph, a lawyer practising in Berlin. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A.

The van had orange writing on the side, and was similar, if not identical, to the van that had been hired from AVA on the same date.

Christopher Napier , Solicitor. 10.    The Court heard addresses by Sir Nicholas Lyell for the Government, by Mr Danelius for the Commission and by Mr Hill for the applicants.

  Don Christopher      - Legal Services, Channel Four TV   Mr.   Godfrey Hodgson, one of the applicants, was also present during the hearing.

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 38681/08 by Christopher

  Nigel   David Frame, Mr Roger Michael Smith, Mr   Stephen   Edward   Battle, Mr   Paul Andrew Hunt, Mr Michael Billing, Ms   Debra Hiley, Mr Simon Barron, Mr Christopher

représentant les travailleurs salariés du Régime Général - Madame Laila HADDOUCHI, Assesseur Pôle social Membre Assesseur représentant les employeurs et les travailleurs indépendants, assistés de Monsieur Christophe

Christophe RUIN, Président Président Mme Sophie NOIR, Conseiller Mme Karine VALLEE, Conseiller En présence de Mme Nadia BELAROUI greffier lors des débats et du prononcé ENTRE : S.A.R.L.

  On the same day, the applicant was brought before a judge.

It also decided, under Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. 5.

He was represented before the Court by Mr Christofer Lenz, a lawyer practising in Stuttgart (Germany). The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

She was acquitted on the section 5 charge relating to the morning of 22 August 1992, and convicted on the section 5 charge relating to the afternoon of the same day.

His case was also considered by an expert team in Barcelona, which reached the same conclusion. The meaning of “futile” was the subject of argument at the domestic level.

On these same dates, prison governors in the three jurisdictions were notified that prisoners who were released early during the custodial element of their sentence on home detention curfew or equivalent

Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Irish national, Mr Christopher