Greece (dec.), no. 58740/11, §§   49 ‑ 52, 25 April 2017, with further references; Bilgen v. Turkey , no.   1571/07, §§ 47-81, 9 March 2021; and Eminağaoğlu v. Turkey , no.

/2009 3224/05 KAPLAN MEHMET ALI ET AUTRES 16/12/2008 16/03/2009 34452/08 KARACA ET AUTRES 31/05/2012 31/08/2012 14886/05 KARACAN 08/06/2010 08/09/2010 54170/08 KAZANLAR 13/12/2011 13/03/2012 4397/08 KEMAL

Osman Özçelik, Kemal Bilget, Kemal Okutan, Bahattin Günel et Murat Bozlak, sont des ressortissants turcs résidant à Ankara. Ils sont représentés devant la Cour par M es M.N. Özmen et B.

Türkiye 31/05/2024 Kemal KOÇ 1955 Kerem ALTIPARMAK 26. 17164/24 Bilgiç c. Türkiye 29/05/2024 Sait BİLGİÇ 1962 Kerem ALTIPARMAK 27. 18054/24 Göndüz c.

    Following their demise in February, Derya Koç’s father Kemal Koç; Meryem Akyol’s father Mehmet Akyol; Lokman Bilgiç’s father Sait Bilgiç; Fatma Demir’s brother Recep Demir; Sahip Edin’s mother

35075/97 BABA 24/10/2006 24/01/2007 10457/08 BERTAN 03/11/2011 03/02/2012 34456/08 BEŞİRE ÖZER AND OTHERS 09/10/2012 09/10/2012 34458/08 BEŞİRE ÖZER AND OTHERS No. 2 09/10/2012 09/10/2012 41166/05 BILGIN

Mahmut BİLGİN Ahmet BİLGİN 14 087 832 12 857 236    22.06.1990 20.02.1991 09.02.1992 18.01.1993 19268/92 Saniye BİLGİN Fehmiye İNCE Leyli BİLGİN Burhan BİLGİN Münir BİLGİN 22 610 936 22.06.1990

En l’affaire Bilget c.

  However, concerning the other five applicants, Şeyho Saya, Çetin Taş, Akın Doğan, Ali Murat Bilgiç and Bahattin Barış Bilgiç, the Court found that the Turkish Government had failed to justify the

Türkiye 13/07/2020 Tezcan ÇETİN 1977 Manisa Turkish   29. 34738/20 Bilgili v. Türkiye 07/08/2020 Ali BİLGİLİ 1968 Kütahya Turkish   30. 35326/20 Keren v.

Türkiye 16/03/2021 Talha KARABACAK 1974 Bayburt Turkish   92. 17032/21 Bilgili v. Türkiye 16/03/2021 Ahmet BİLGİLİ 1968 İzmir Turkish   93. 17110/21 Sarı v.

  Osman Özçelik, Kemal Bilget, Kemal Okutan, Bahattin Günel et Murat Bozlak («   les requérants   »), ont saisi la Cour le 28 décembre 1999 en vertu de l’article 34 de la Convention de sauvegarde

    Kemal Bülbül 14.

    A l’origine de l’affaire se trouve une requête (n°   19302/92) dirigée contre la République de Turquie et dont six ressortissants de cet Etat, Aziz Şen, İsmet Şen, Kemal Şen, Mahmut

Turkey 09/06/2020 Kemal ÖNCE 1978 Osmaniye Turkish Osmaniye T Type Prison   78. 33531/20 Aytunç v.

Turquie (n° 20132/92)   7 850 EUR 4)     Leyli Bilgin c. Turquie (n° 20133/92)   7 850 EUR 5)     Münir Bilgin c.

Türkiye 28/05/2021 Salih ALBAY 1972 Kayseri Turkish İbrahim KOCAOĞUL 103. 32308/21 Bilgen v. Türkiye 07/06/2021 Habil BİLGEN 1993 Manisa Turkish Gökhan DİRİCAN 104. 32571/21 Topuz v.

Türkiye 22/09/2020 Hilmi Kemal AYABAKTI 1976 Tokat Turkish Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU 89. 42696/20 Acar v. Türkiye 15/09/2020 Hasan ACAR 1980 Sinop Turkish   90. 42699/20 Bozkurt v.

CENNET ET MEHMET SALIH AYAN 27/06/2006 11/12/2006 25660/94 AYDIN SÜHEYLA 24/05/2005 24/08/2005 44936/04 BABAT ET AUTRES 12/01/2010 12/04/2010 10036/03 BEKTAŞ ET ÖZALP 20/04/2010 20/07/2010 25659/94 BILGIN

Turquie (n o 28150/03) Le requérant, Kemal Taman, est un ressortissant turc né en 1969 et résidant à Kırşehir (Turquie).