CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Juge Unique 4
DTA_2204342_20221201
1 décembre 2022
Les dispositions du présent article s'appliquent sans préjudice des dispositions de l'article 22 ". L'article 22 de cette même convention stipule : " 1.
Page 26 sur 799
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0329JUD001953810
29 mars 2018
35782/12 also relied on Article 13 of the Convention and argued that he had had no effective remedy in this connection.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227705
30 août 2023
The applicant also complains under Article 13 of the Convention of a lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204662
3 septembre 2020
(No. 24612/07)) 29/03/2018 29/03/2018 19001/05 RJ IMPORT ROGER JAEGER A.G.
ECLI:CEDH:001-212458
16 septembre 2021
Juge Unique 3
DTA_2400076_20240216
16 février 2024
L. 425-4 du code de l'entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d'asile ; - méconnaît les stipulations des articles 12 et 13 de la convention de Varsovie du 16 mai 2005, les dispositions de l'article
ECLI:CEDH:001-110128
9 février 2012
in the Odessa police holding centre and the Kherson, Kakhovka and Mykolayiv ITTs; and - under Article 10 of the Convention that his conviction was connected to his journalistic activity
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626DEC000964102
26 juin 2007
Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 November 2001, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility
ECLI:CEDH:001-230811
9 janvier 2024
The applicants complain under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and under Article 13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC002194003
23 mai 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-200962
14 janvier 2020
The applicants’ allegations of risks under Article 3 of the Convention were dismissed as unsubstantiated. 6.
ECLI:CEDH:001-234249
16 mai 2024
24 § 2 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152557
27 janvier 2015
She directly mentioned violations of Articles 3 and 14 of the Convention and requested a thorough investigation and the punishment of those responsible. 29.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217DEC006516817
17 décembre 2020
The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC001746919
8 avril 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110DEC000203304
10 novembre 2009
Article 14 of the Convention provides the following: “The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in [the] Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207DEC000139715
7 décembre 2017
The applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0511DEC001774208
11 mai 2017
Some applicants (cases nos. 7992/15 and 9758/16) also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1110JUD000893709
10 novembre 2016
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC003667504
20 septembre 2007
Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 31 August 2004, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility