NANTES INTIMÉ : Maître André ROLLAND né le [Date naissance 3] 1951 à [Localité 4] [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] [Localité 2] Représenté par Me Guy LALLEMENT de la SELARL LALLEMENT SOUBEILLE ADAMCZYK

23/09/2009 9382/05 ŻELASKO 04/03/2008 04/06/2008     Affaires concernant la durée excessive des procédures civiles (groupe Majewski )   Requête Affaire Arrêt du Définitif le 30523/07 ADAMCZUK

Turquie (n° 8537/05) Violation de l’article 6 § 1 – toutes les affaires   Révision Adamczuk c.

23/09/2009 9382/05 ŻELASKO 04/03/2008 04/06/2008     Affaires concernant la durée excessive des procédures civiles (groupe Majewski )   Requête Affaire Arrêt du Définitif le 30523/07 ADAMCZUK

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 28551/04 by Grzegorz ADAMCZYK

  Adamczuk, a lawyer practising in Zamość. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

2009 23/09/2009 9382/05 ŻELASKO 04/03/2008 04/06/2008     Cases concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings ( Majewski group)   Application Case Judgment of Final on 30523/07 ADAMCZUK

Hongrie (n° 99077/05) Adamczuk c. Pologne (n° 30523/07) Bieńkowska c. Pologne (n° 13282/04) Figiel c. Pologne (n° 38190/05) Roman Wilczyński c.

2009 23/09/2009 9382/05 ŻELASKO 04/03/2008 04/06/2008     Cases concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings ( Majewski group)   Application Case Judgment of Final on 30523/07 ADAMCZUK

Turquie (n o 8537/05)   Révision Adamczuk c. Pologne (n o 30523/07) Le Gouvernement demande la révision de l’arrêt rendu le 17   juillet 2008.

Turkey (no. 8537/05) Violation of Article 6 § 1 – in all cases   Revision Adamczuk v. Poland (no. 30523/07) The Polish Government requested revision of the judgment of 17 July 2008.

      Application No. 25718/94                       by Swi*toslaw ADAMCZAK

Conseil de Prud'hommes de TROYES, section Industrie (n° F 22/00282) Monsieur [R] [S] [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] Représenté par Me Ludiwine MOINAULT, avocat au barreau de REIMS et par la SCP LAURENT ADAMCZYK

Slovakia , no. 29518/10, § 108, 12   June 2012; and Adamczuk v. Poland (revision), no. 30523/07, § 78, 15   June 2010). 35.

Hungary (no. 99077/05) Adamczuk v. Poland (no. 30523/07) Bieńkowska v. Poland (no. 13282/04) Figiel v. Poland (No. 1) (no. 38190/05) Roman Wilczyński v.

Turkey (no. 8537/05)   Revision Adamczuk v. Poland (no. 30523/07) The Government requests revision of the judgment delivered on 17   July 2008.

Russia (dec.), no. 12622/04, 21 October 2008, and Adamczuk v. Poland (revision), no. 30523/07, § 78, 15 June 2010).

Hongrie (n° 99077/05) Adamczuk c. Pologne (n° 30523/07) Bieńkowska c. Pologne (n° 13282/04) Figiel c. Pologne (n° 38190/05) Roman Wilczyński c.

compensation in such circumstances and it cannot be said that the scope of the compensatory remedy in the instant case was such as to impose on the applicant an individual and excessive burden (see Adamczyk

interests of the authorities in declaring the company bankrupt and the applicant’s proprietary interest must be examined in the light of the particular circumstances of the case (see, mutatis mutandis, Adamczyk