espèce, elle doit, conformément à sa jurisprudence, se déterminer essentiellement à la lumière de la motivation retenue par les juridictions nationales à l’appui de leur condamnation de l’intéressé ( Gözel

Türkiye 22/06/2023 Fatih ÇABUKOĞLU 1991 Balıkesir Turkish Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ Lack of reasonable suspicion   31693/23 Gökçen v.

Türkiye 12/04/2022 Şaban BODUR 1982 Kırıkkale Turkish Mehmet CENGİZ 6. 23382/22 Öztürk v. Türkiye 22/04/2022 Emre ÖZTÜRK 1990 Ağrı Turkish Adem KARAMUSTAFAOĞLU 7. 23756/22 Karapınar v.

Türkiye 20/09/2019 Mahmut TÜRKMEN 1971 Ankara Turkish Hüseyin AYGÜN 54. 55078/19 Göksu v. Türkiye 03/10/2019 Bedir GÖKSU 1965 Kocaeli Turkish Elvan BAĞ CANBAZ 55. 56066/19 Durmuş v.

Türkiye 27/12/2019 Serhan BEDUR 1986 Burdur Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK   10706/20 Cenik v. Türkiye 14/02/2020 Hüseyin CENİK 1993 Giresun Turkish     10753/20 Ulukütük v.

VEFA   46902/08 08/09/2008 Vesile MERCAN 01/01/1934 Diyarbakır   Mahmut VEFA   46903/08 08/09/2008 Mustafa OĞUZ 01/01/1954 Diyarbakır   Mahmut VEFA   46904/08 08/09/2008 Ömer GÖKDERE

Türkiye 16/10/2019 Hüsmen KOÇAK 1976 Tekirdağ Turkish Nihat KILIÇ Awarded 33. 57578/19 Gökcen v. Türkiye 24/10/2019 Abdullah GÖKCEN 1987 Hatay Turkish Dudu ERTUNÇ Awarded 34. 58724/19 Karaduman v.

/02/1962 Bursa   Ümmügülsüm ÇALDAĞI 13/12/1952 Antalya   Hayri ÇETİN 01/06/1952 Antalya   Nadir ÇIRAK 23/06/1944 Antalya   Yaşiye DEMİRBAŞ 01/01/1943 Ankara       Cengiz

Evren DEĞER 01/01/1961 Ankara   Halil SEVİNÇ Labour Court (Ankara 2 İş Mahkemesi, E:2005/1387, K: 2006/108)   15771/07 03/04/2007 Cengiz SELEN 01/01/1973 Kırıkkale   Adnan ALTIN Court of

protéger la réputation et les autres droits de [ceux-ci], il s’impose d’ordonner l’interdiction de publier et de diffuser dans la presse écrite, les médias audiovisuels et sur Internet [ tüm yazılı, görsel

Türkiye 08/12/2020 Cengiz SARIKAYA 1970 Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ   55159/20 Demir v. Türkiye 26/11/2020 Alaettin DEMİR 1972 Antalya Turkish İshak IŞIK   30/21 Karaağaç v.

App. no Case Title Date of introduction Complaints 1 70892/17 Gökçek v. Turkey 26/07/2017 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 2 1/18 Harput v.

Türkiye 10/08/2018 Erol ÇİLKIZ 1986 Istanbul Turkish Cengiz YILMAZ Awarded 62. 39536/18 Kaya v.

Turkey 02/08/2019 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 60 43444/19 Gökdal v.

Cengiz Gökçek . Les médecins estimèrent que le requérant présentait des chances de guérison, puisqu'il n'était pas atteint de sénilité.

Ali Topal (1978) 65 Kasım Gülşen (1977) 16 Arif Marangoz (1976) 66 Mehmet Durmuş (1974) 17 Ashabil Kazmamürü(61) 67 Mehmet Emin Bağaç (1967) 18 Atilla Küçük (1969) 68 Mehmet Sungurtaş (1973) 19 Aydın Göksu

Türkiye 04/07/2018 Cengiz HASIRCI 1986 Eskişehir Turkish Şahin HASIRCI 47. 33003/18 Persil v. Türkiye 26/06/2018 Yıldıray PERSİL 1975 Ankara Turkish İsmet ÇELİK 48. 33009/18 Sezer v.