France , 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ III; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no.   28114/95, § 44, ECHR   1999 ‑ VI; and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no.

France , 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, and Dalban v.   Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, §   44, ECHR 1999-VI). 15.

France , 25   juin 1996, § 36, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-III, Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o   28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999-VI, et Jensen c.

suffit en principe à lui retirer la qualité de «   victime   » que si les autorités nationales ont reconnu, explicitement ou en substance, puis réparé la violation de la Convention   » ( Dalban

Germany , 15 July 1982, § 66, Series A no. 51, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no.   28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).

applicant, the Court notes that the national authorities dealing with the case have not found a violation of the relevant provisions of the Convention in view of the applicant’s complaints before it (see Dalban

has died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant’s heirs or close family members who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before it (see Dalban

(cf. arrêt Dalban c. Roumanie du 28 septembre 1999, à paraître dans le recueil officiel de la Cour, § 1)   2.

For practical reasons, Mr Emin Ağduk, Mr Fahrettin Boran and Mr Ramazan Balku will continue to be called as the “applicants” in this decision although their heirs are now to be regarded as such (see Dalban

Vasile Vancea le «   requérant   » (voir, par exemple, Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o   28114/95, §   1, CEDH   1999 ‑ VI). 3.

Germany , cited above, §   66, Series A no. 51, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no.   28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).

For practical reasons Mr Nicolae Constantinescu will continue to be called “the applicant” in this judgment, although Ms Floarea Constantinescu and Ms Silvia Surcel are now to be regarded as such ( Dalban

  Akos Greguss «   le deuxième requérant   » ( Dalban c.   Roumanie [GC], n o   28114/95, § 1, CEDH 1999-VI). A.     Les circonstances de l’espèce 4.

    For practical reasons, Mrs Zarakolu will continue to be called “the applicant”, although Mr Zarakolu is now to be regarded as such (see Dalban v.

filiation avec Mustapha X..., l'extrait de registre matrice de la famille X... faisant apparaître une liste de noms répertoriés sous ce patronyme et précisant que Aïcha, T..., A..., Goucem, Hanifa et Dahmane

la qualité de «   victime   » que si les autorités nationales ont reconnu, explicitement ou en substance, puis réparé la violation alléguée de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, Dalban

  Raţă (cf. arrêt Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, §   1, CEDH 1999-VI). Le   gouvernement roumain («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M.

Moreover, the Tbilisi Court of Appeal in its decision acknowledged a number of procedural irregularities that had taken place during the applicant’s prosecution and trial (contrast Dalban v.

    For practical reasons, Mrs Zarakolu will continue to be called “the applicant”, although Mr Zarakolu is now to be regarded as such (see Dalban v.