provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the courts’ interpretation of it, what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable and what penalty will be imposed for the act committed (see Kafkaris

the purposes of sub ‑ paragraph (a) of Article 5 § 1, means that there must be a sufficient causal connection between the conviction and the deprivation of liberty at issue (see, inter alia , Kafkaris

On 15 June 2010 the applicant contested P.’s decision to stay the proceedings before the Kanaker-Zeytun District of Yerevan (the District Court).

On 6 May 2016 the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan, upon the investigator’s application, ordered the first applicant’s pre-trial detention for two months.

    On 16 September 2016 the Special Investigative Service investigator, who had taken over the investigation of the case by that time, lodged a request with the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District

    Le 28 mai 2009, à la suite de l’occupation du tarmac de l’aéroport de Nouméa par des militants du syndicat USTKE (Union syndicale des travailleurs kanak et des exploités), l’intervention

Referring to the Court’s case-law in this area (notably Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium , no.

   Article 101 :         <Original>         "Anayasa Mahkemesince bir siyasî parti hakkinda kapatma karari:     

   Article 101 :         "Anayasa Mahkemesince bir siyasî parti hakkinda kapatma karari:         a) Parti tüzügünün veya programinin

        Seçimden önce veya sonra bir suç isledigi ileri sürülen bir       milletvekili, meclis karari olmadikça tutulamaz, sorguya    

    On 24 November 1995 the public prosecutor at the Diyarbakır State Security Court decided that no prosecution should be brought against Cavit Özalp ( takipsizlik karari ) on account of his

law but also relates to the quality of the law, requiring it to be compatible with the rule of law, a concept inherent in all the Articles of the Convention (see Stafford , cited above, § 63, and Kafkaris

applicant’s administrative detention was in reality part of his pre-trial detention, under Article 5 § 1 (c), as a criminal suspect, but that his procedural rights as a suspect were not safeguarded (see Kafkaris

Türkiye 27/03/2023 Hüsamettin KAPAKLI 1981 Ankara Turkish    

  53236/99, § 65, 10 December 2002; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no.   21906/04, § 117, ECHR 2008 ‑ ...; and M. v. Germany , no. 19359/04, §   88, 17 December 2009).

xa0;         Z.K. 1990 grecque Athènes                      Nikolaos KANAKIDIS

Après avoir quitté la Polynésie le 3 mars 1986 (paragraphe 13 ci-dessus), Mme Piermont se rendit en Nouvelle-Calédonie, invitée par des élus locaux, dont le président du Front de libération nationale kanake

    At 8.30 p.m. on that day the applicant was brought before the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan which examined the investigator’s motion seeking to have him detained for

the meantime, the Administrative Court had decided, by its decision of 16 October 2012, that the applicant’s forced absence should be calculated up to 15   December 2011, the day on which the Kanaker-Zeytun