In so far as it is suggested that the applicant should have used the remedy under Article 234 of the CCRP, the Court notes that this remedy could have been used as from 29 June 2001 only in the course

) introduced by the Attorney General's Office (Generalprokuratur), quashed the Regional Court's judgment and decision of 20 February 1990 and remitted the case to the Regional Court.

En appel, la cour d'appel, en cours de délibéré, a demandé aux parties de « produire l'acte de signification de l'ordonnance du juge de la mise en état du 20 décembre 2018 et de formuler toutes observations

whether, in view of Supreme Court's role and nature of issues to be decided by it, there had been a violation in the particular circumstances - not for Court to express view on whether Supreme Court's

Court's task limited to determining whether, under Article 5   §   4, lawfulness of applicant's detention should have been reviewed in France. Recapitulation of Court's case-law.

Appealing against court decisions “1.

to their respective countries of origin for the duration of the proceedings before the Court. 43.

On 17 July 1996, on appeal by the applicant, the Federal Court of Justice varied the verdict, finding the applicant guilty of three counts of indecently assaulting a child, three counts of indecent assault

. # Androniki Vlachou v Court of Auditors of the European Communities. # Competition procedure - Compliance with ajudgment of the Court. # Case 135/87.

The other complaints fell outside the Court's jurisdiction: detention pending trial had ended on 19 July 1989, when the Martial Law Court gave judgment - complaint relating to the court's lawfulness, independence

Il en va de même, enfin, des courriers reçus par le commissaire enquêteur dans le cadre de l'enquête publique.

    On 9 October 2009 the Court of Appeal, which was sitting as a court of first instance, found the applicant guilty of the robbery and premeditated murder of Bo., several counts of abuse of

  According to S. 295 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Supreme Court, when deciding of an appeal against sentence, has to base itself on the lower court's finding of guilt.

The court cited the likelihood that the applicant might try to interfere with the proper course of the proceedings because of the likelihood of a severe sentence being imposed on him.

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de M. Lancelot, - les conclusions de M.

On 27 August 2021 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases as, in the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, the applicant’s sister informed

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 October 1984.#Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie de Rouen v A. Guyot.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour d'appel de Rouen - France.

Arrêt de la Cour du 14 février 1984.#Wolfgang Gewiese et Manfred Mehlich contre Colin Scott Mackenzie.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: High Court of Justiciary (Scotland) - Royaume-Uni.

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 1985.#Office nationale des pensions pour travailleurs salariés (ONPTS) v Francesco Romano.

Sentenza della Corte del 29 novembre 1978.#Pigs Marketing Board contro Raymond Redmond.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: Armagh Magistrates' Court (Northern Ireland) - Regno Unito.