France judgment of 17 March 1997, para. 12;   Reports, 1997; Huber v. France judgment of 17 February 1998,   Reports 1997-II no. 32, para. 36).

Finland , judgment of 19 July 1995, Series   A no. 322, p. 16, § 42; Nideröst ‑ Huber v.

In my humble opinion, that is not the problematic issue. The applicant complained of what he saw as the retrospective application of Article 215a of the Criminal Code (see paragraph 17).

In my humble opinion, the Convention does not allow for a subjective sifting of the rights and freedoms recognised therein.

future violations as those found by the Court in the above-mentioned individual applications, And whereas a number of ind i vidual recourses against the Republic are pending before the European Court of Huma

evidence needed for their claims to succeed, but also to have knowledge of, and comment on, all evidence adduced or observations filed, with a view to influencing the court’s decision (see the Nideröst-Huber

evidence needed for their claims to succeed, but also to have knowledge of, and comment on, all evidence adduced or observations filed, with a view to influencing the court’s decision (see the Nideröst-Huber

  44962/98, §   31, ECHR 2003 ‑ V; Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland , 18 February 1997, §   23, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Kress v.

{ font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  Application No. 12794/87   Jutta HUBER

reason to suppose that pre-trial detention would not have occurred had the applicant’s remand been a matter within the competence of a judicial officer who did offer the guarantees of Article 5 § 3 ( Huber

[HUB] [AYB] [Adresse 3273] [Adresse 1558] [Localité 1338] Mme [SR] [UTE] [Adresse 627] [Localité 2729] M. [SNY] [TL] [Adresse 1016] [Localité 3047] M.

Court H.R., Huber judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 188, p. 18, para. 43; Brincat judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-A, p. 12, para. 21).

includes the right to adversarial proceedings which means the opportunity for the parties to have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adduced or observations filed (see, for example, the Nideröst-Huber

grecque Athènes   V.H. 1985 grecque Athènes   Nikolaos HATZITRYFON 1950 grecque Thessalonique   Petros HATZOPOULOS 1979 grecque Athènes   H.H. 1972 norvégienne Athènes   Michael HUBER

    It suffices to say the following to show why, in my humble view, the Serbian authorities failed to make adequate and effective efforts to enforce the applicant’s right to contact with his

They state that on 10 December 1990 during the journey of an army patrol vehicle from Rockwood Base to Hump Vehicle Checkpoint near Strabane in County Tyrone, the rear doors of the vehicle fell open and

    In my humble view, there has been a violation of Article 6 since the applicant did not have access to a court owing to the tie vote reached by the Supreme Court, sitting as an appeal court

    I will now explain why, in my humble view, the child’s removal to Russia by its mother was wrongful. 10.

    In my humble view, it should be noted that the domestic courts did nothing other than confirm the sanctions imposed by the tax authorities, through a mechanical application of the law.