Türkiye 05/08/2020 Mehmet AKDAĞ 1977 Malatya Turkish Azmi Kaan ŞEN   37169/20 Kara v. Türkiye 06/08/2020 Zafer KARA 1981 Konya Turkish Sinan DAĞ   37488/20 Kaya v.

  Switzerland , 25 March 1994, § 31, Series A no. 287; Karner v. Austria , no. 40016/98, § 23, ECHR   2003 ‑ IX; and Thevenon v. France (dec.), no.

The Enforcement of Prison Sentences Act ( Zakon o izvršavanju kazne zatvora , Official Gazette no.   128/1999 of 30   November 1999, and no.

task in the present case is not to assess whether access should henceforth be granted to the applicant, but to examine the actual circumstances of his case before the Court (see, mutatis mutandis , Karner

This criterion is not to be applied in a rigid, mechanical and inflexible way (see Karner v. Austria , no.   40016/98, § 25, ECHR 2003-IX).

right, is indispensable for putting the protection mechanism of the Convention into motion, this criterion cannot be applied in a rigid, mechanical and inflexible way throughout the whole proceedings Karner

Kaan                     Malden             &#

It could not be assumed that this contract had been terminated by each of the applicant’s attempts at escape, which were attributable to her illness (“ Es kann nicht angenommen werden, daß dieser konkludent

genügt es, wenn der Vorwurf zwar nicht den Eigentümer des      Gegenstands, aber eine Person trifft, die für den Eigentümer über      den Gegenstand verfügen kann

    The relevant provisions of the Enforcement of Prison Sentences Act ( Zakon o izvršavanju kazne zatvora , Official Gazette nos.

    The relevant provisions of the Enforcement of Prison Sentences Act ( Zakon o izvršavanju kazne zatvora , Official Gazette nos.

    The relevant provisions of the Enforcement of Prison Sentences Act ( Zakon o izvršavanju kazne zatvora , Official Gazette nos.

It could not be assumed that this contract had been terminated by each of the applicant’s attempts to escape, which were attributable to her illness (“ Es kann nicht angenommen werden, daß dieser konkludent

eventuality expressly provided for in Article 37 §   1   (a) which may be deemed akin to the second applicant’s not having signed the referral request in the instant case (see, mutatis mutandis , Karner

  Der Telefonanschluss von      Drittpersonen kann stets überwacht werden, wenn der Verdacht      begründet ist, dass der Beschuldigte ihn benutzt."

has died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant’s heirs or close family members who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before it (see Karner

Mustafa ÖZTOK Court of Cassation K:2006/6123             67/08 12/12/2007 Mustafa SAYIN 06/08/1948 Ankara   Necla ÖZCAN 04/03/1945 Ankara   Kaan

Şuraya buraya bayrak dikmekle, bayrak dikmeye çalışmakla sadece kan dökersiniz, sadece sorunu on yıllarca ertelersiniz, sorunu büyütürsünüz.

It found that the further appeals did not provide grounds for quashing the impugned rulings ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden ).