AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68167-68635
26 juin 2001
26 juin 2001
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68122-68590
15 mars 2000
15 mars 2000
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2234655-2387890
15 janvier 2008
15 janvier 2008
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68001-68469
28 octobre 1999
28 octobre 1999
Speaking at an event held to pay tribute to the work of the Commission, President of the European Court of Human Rights Luzius Wildhaber said: “The Convention system owes a great debt to
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68231-68699
7 décembre 2000
7 décembre 2000
After having found that the applicant could have had access to a judgment in abridged form, th e European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 §§ 1 (right
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1802129-1890423
3 octobre 2006
3 octobre 2006
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68257-68725
18 juillet 2000
18 juillet 2000
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded her 40,000 French francs (FRF) for non-pecuniary damage. Judgment in French. 3) Droulez v.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2277411-2430434
26 février 2008
26 février 2008
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-645959-651611
7 novembre 2002
7 novembre 2002
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officielle8ème sous-section jugeant seule
CETAT:CETATEXT000024226845
16 juin 2011
16 juin 2011
ressort des pièces du dossier soumis aux juges du fond que la SARL HELIO RESTAURANTS qui a exercé jusqu'en 2000 une activité de restauration au Centre Hélio Marin à Vendays Montalivet (Gironde) avant
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1450320-1522996
22 septembre 2005
22 septembre 2005
Consequently, the Court held, by six votes to one, that there had not been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187083
17 septembre 2018
17 septembre 2018
The Kretinga District Court held that it was not the first time the applicant had failed to come to a hearing.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1060297-1097800
27 juillet 2004
27 juillet 2004
Accordingly, it held that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 1 (c).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1118JUD000504912
18 novembre 2014
18 novembre 2014
The applicant’s daughter could help her financially and could also visit her in Russia. 18.
Source officielleciv3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C300536
15 mai 2013
15 mai 2013
l'encontre de la société BEGP, l'arrêt retient que le second expert indique que le premier expert avait prévu des travaux insuffisants pour mettre fin aux désordres, que l'impossibilité pour la SCI Hélios
Source officielle2e chambre civile
6438f2e8a942a604f5e936b1
13 avril 2023
13 avril 2023
EXPRO, JCP DE MONTPELLIER N° RG 22/31127 APPELANTE : La société HELLO POULET, société par actions simplifiée unipersonnelle au capital social de 500,00 €, dont le siège social est situé [Adresse
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1839968-1938500
14 novembre 2006
14 novembre 2006
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1736176-1823760
20 juillet 2006
20 juillet 2006
Accordingly, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8.
Source officielle16e chambre
631ade69f575634f1371efc7
8 septembre 2022
8 septembre 2022
irrépétibles, condamné la SCI Helder II à payer à M.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253c8debd3db21cbdd867cc
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
ETS HELLIO S.A. SOFIQUEM C/ Mme Geneviève X... épouse LE Y...
Source officiellePage 70 sur 2440