43924/02, § 30, 23 January 2007; and Roseiro Bento v.   Portugal , no.   29288/02, § 43, 18 April 2006). 49.

Année de naissance Lieu de résidence Représentant                  1977 Rossano A.G. LANA ET A.

période comprise entre le 26 décembre 2004, date de son hospitalisation, et le 12 août 2005, dès lors, d’une part, qu’elle était d’abord hospitalisée à Rennes, puis prise en charge en convalescence à Roscoff

ROSSO 1961 ASTI italienne E. ROVEYAZ 1963 AOSTA italienne M. SACCHI 1961 BARDONECCHIA italienne M. SERINI 1962 GALLIATE italienne G. SORRENTINO 1951 VINZAGLIO italienne R.

judgment of 10/07/03, final on 03/12/03   10 000 1 700 € 04/02/2004 19830/03 Cuccaro Granatelli, judgment of 08/12/2005, final on 08/03/2006   8 000 3 500 € 28/03/2006 63938/00 Cucinotta Rosario

Par deux mémoires en intervention, enregistrés le 27 août 2020 et le 23 juin 2022, la société AXA France Iard, agissant en qualité d'assureur la société SG Paris Forum Distribution représentée par Me Rosano

Constitutional Court had reduced the compensation from EUR   30,000 to 15,000 on the basis that the applicants had taken too long to initiate proceedings; and Maria Ludgarda Borg et vs   Rosario

taken by it does not as a rule constitute an effective remedy (see Granger v. the United Kingdom , no. 11932/86, Commission decision of 9   May 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 56, p. 199, and Roseiro

Italian Yuri Massimo PUCE 1977 Rome Italian Alberto REBONATO 1978 Perugia Italian Silvia REMEDIANI 1970 Macerata Italian Katia RIPAMONTI 1972 Rome Italian Antonella ROSELLI 1977 Rome Italian Stefano ROSI

municipal le 28 septembre 2015 ayant pour objet l'« Approbation de la convention de projet urbain partenarial à intervenir entre la ville de Saint-Ouen et la X pour un projet immobilier sis 77 rue des Rosiers

Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Macedonian national, Ms   Rosica

    In addition, where there is a doubt regarding the effectiveness of a domestic remedy, that issue should be submitted to the domestic courts (see Roseiro Bento v.

no eviction was ordered by the courts: -     Carmelo Grech vs the Housing Authority , Constitutional Court judgment of 10 February 2016, -     Maria Ludgarda sive Mary Borg et vs Rosario

examples dated 2016 where no eviction was ordered by the courts: - Carmelo Grech vs the Housing Authority , Constitutional Court judgment of 10 February 2016; - Maria Ludgarda sive Mary Borg et vs Rosario

Hungary (dec.), no. 2351/06, 9 November 2010, with reference to Roseiro Bento v.   Portugal (dec.), no. 29288/02, ECHR 2004-XII (extracts)).

Constitutional Court had reduced the compensation from EUR   30,000 to 15,000 on appeal on the basis that the applicants had taken too long to initiate proceedings; and Maria Ludgarda Borg et vs   Rosario

Constitutional Court had reduced the compensation from EUR   30,000 to 15,000 on the basis that the applicants had taken too long to initiate proceedings; and Maria Ludgarda Borg et vs   Rosario

alloués à chacun des autres requérants   300   15549/03 23/04/2003 Gioconda Carapella 16/07/1968 Romano Giovanni Rome 03/10/2018 31/10/2018 4 500   300   15922/03 02/04/2001 Adriana Rossi

- les observations de Me Defaux, représentant la commune de Valloire, -les observations de Me Mestrius, représentant l'association Valloire Nature et Avenir, - et les observations de Me Nallet-Rosado

Consulter le texte intégral →