The applicant appealed to the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ( gerechtshof ). In the course of the ensuing proceedings, M. was subjected to cross-examination by the defence. 8.

On 16 March 1993 the court imposed a fine on the applicant for offending the court’s authority.

    A hearing scheduled for 12 January 1998 was adjourned by the District Court of its own motion.

He was sentenced to death in 1996 on two counts of murder, one count of attempted murder and one count of rape.

donc, à son égard, que du jour de cette assignation ; qu'en l'espèce la cour d'appel avait constaté que M.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIÈME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Versailles, 28 octobre 2005), que M.

The trial court’s decision as regards a request for release is subject to appeal to the higher court (Article 344 § 3).

As to the applicant’s sentence,   the court agreed with the findings of the City Court, emphasising that the fraud was a serious one.

29 juin 2018, entre les parties, par la cour d'appel de Douai ; Remet l'affaire et les parties dans l'état où elles se trouvaient avant cet arrêt et les renvoie devant la cour d'appel d'Amiens.

  Compliance Principles in Court's case-law restated. 1.

, the applicants would be able, in due course, to lodge a fresh application with the Court.

    On 23 March 2009 the Court of Appeal ( hovrätten ) decided on the appeals against the District Court’s judgment in the criminal case (see paragraph 5 above).

On 26 June 2001 the Wrocław Court of Appeal ( Sąd Apelacyjny ) quashed the first-instance judgment as regards two of the counts and remitted the case for further examination.

Arrêt de la Cour du 16 juillet 1998.#Rui Alberto Pereira Roque contre His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor of Jersey.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: Royal Court of Jersey.

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 1988.#Criminal proceedings against R. Lambert.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Cour d'appel - Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Arrêt de la Cour du 4 octobre 1991.#The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Ltd contre Stephen Grogan et autres.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: High Court - Irlande.

Judgment of the Court of 12 November 1969.#Caisse de maladie des C.F.L.

The district court published its decision and posted the notification of the hearing on the court’s notice board.

The Supreme Court had ordered a re-examination of the case. In the course of the new examination the District Court had scheduled a number of hearings.

application because the applicant had failed to inform the Court of two Constitutional Court’s judgments that had awarded him financial compensation (see Magát v.