family or to end his placement in temporary care.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that his right to a hearing within a   reasonable time had been violated and that he had no effective remedy at his disposal in that respect. 4.

In his reply to the Government’s observations dated 15 July 2011, the applicant also complained for the first time about the conditions of his transportation during the criminal proceedings and the conditions

    The applicant alleged in particular that his conviction in 2008-2009 on account of having organised an unauthorised demonstration amounted to an interference with his rights under Articles

home to collect his property.

After his death, 14/32 of his share of Polydendri devolved to his widow, and 14/96 to each of his three children, Sophia, Constantinos (the first applicant) and Irene (the second applicant).

The father died on 26 June 2006, naming his daughter as sole heir in his will. 16.

[The applicant] and his lawyer objected ...

After his death, 14/32 of his share to Polidendri devolved to his widow, and 14/96 to each of his three children, Sophia, Constantinos (the first applicant) and Irene (the eighth applicant).

    While exercising his contact rights in accordance with a judgment of 13   May 2014 (see paragraph 57 below), on 24 August 2014 the applicant took his second-born son and left Russia

exécutoire délivrée le : AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE GRENOBLE CHAMBRE SOCIALE - PROTECTION SOCIALE ARRÊT DU JEUDI 11 AVRIL 2024 Appel d'une décision (N° RG 19/0602) rendue

de la SCP TOUBHANS - D'HIEUX-LARDON - CHAPUT, avocat au barreau de PARIS et par Me Béatrice BILLIARD, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque P304 INTIMÉE S.C.I.

Germany , judgment of 15   July   1982, Series A no. 51, § 66) such as would render the applicant no longer a victim of any alleged breach of his rights.

At 19.30 on 8 December 1976 the second applicant was visited by his parents, who declined to countersign his confessions.

Vous indiquez que le centre de rétention mentionne un rendez-vous médical hier à 16h00 mais hier j'étais au tribunal administratif à 16h00, je n'ai pas vu de médecin.

He therefore claimed that the proceedings were null and void, on the ground of a violation of his defence rights.

His defence was that he had known nothing about the conspiracy to import drugs.

The Government further maintain that the applicant has had an effective remedy at his disposal in respect of his complaint about the length of the proceedings as required by Article 13 of the Convention

  To supplement his income he also treats patients from outside his community.

His complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the alleged irreducibility of his life imprisonment sentence in that he was not enabled to make progress towards rehabilitation and had no prospect