En l’affaire Solska et Rybicka c.

} .s23ADBB69 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s116BEA21 { font-size:8pt } Résolution CM/ResDH(2011)240 [1] Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Rybacki

Judgment of Final on Rybacki (52479/99) 13/01/2009 13/04/2009   Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded in the judgments

sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 6344/24 and 21244/24 Agnieszka Edyta SZOSTAK against Poland and Kamil RYBACKI

#Ochranná známka Európskej únie – Konanie vo veci zrušenia – Obrazová ochranná známka Únie zobrazujúca vzor zlatých rybiek na modrom podklade – Vyhlásenie zrušenia – Riadne používanie ochrannej známky

    The applicant further claimed that, although the factual basis of and the complaints raised in her application had been similar to those in the case of Solska and Rybicka v.

In the case of Solska and Rybicka v.

    The relevant domestic law and practice is set out in the judgment Solska and Rybicka v. Poland , nos. 30491/17 and 31083/17, §§ 43-52, 20   September 2018. COMPLAINTS 24.

Rybiński, a lawyer practising in Sopot. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms J. Chrzanowska, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  Violation of Article 5 § 3 Violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 (fairness) Rybacki v.

  Rybiński, a lawyer practising in Sopot. The   Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   J.   Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

En particulier, après avoir fait un résumé de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne ( Rybacki c.   Pologne , n o   52479/99, 13 janvier 2009, 1 er avril 2010, Asciutto c.

xa0;      Application No. 29806/96                       by Ryszard RYBICKI

  Rybacki v. Pol   and (no. 52479/99) The applicant, Andrzej Rybacki, is a Polish national who was born in 1967 and lives in Włocławek (Poland).

} .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Note d’information sur la jurisprudence de la Cour 221 Août-Septembre 2018 Solska et Rybicka

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Marchand, - et les observations de Me Rybicki, substituant Me Boy, représentant M. A. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Frédéric Ryback, demeurant 11, allée Sarah Bernhardt, 59553 Cuincy, 46 / de M. Sébastien Sauvage, demeurant 7, rue du Fournil, 85140 La Merlatière, 47 / de M.

  Rybacki c. Pologne (n o 52479/99) Le requérant, Andrzej Rybacki, est un ressortissant polonais né en 1967 et résidant à Włocławek (Pologne).

  220; Rybacki v. Poland , no. 52479/99, § 56, 13 January 2009; Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia , nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, §§   635-647, 25 July 2013; and Moroz v.

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Marchand, - et les observations de Me Rybicki, substituant Me Boy, représentant M. B. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.