The Government contested those claims as unjustified and argued that the applicant had failed to formulate a claim for just satisfaction. 31.

(the defendant in the proceedings), to specify the value of her claim.

Section 55 Claims for just satisfaction “1.     All claims for just satisfaction must be lodged separately with each level of jurisdiction.

Article 6 § 1: The dismissal of a court action as a result of the interpretation of the legal capacity of a defendant authority, compared with that of one of its departments or executive bodies, could

a fair hearing), the applicants complain that the Court of Cassation’s interpretation of judicial privilege led to a denial of justice and deprived them of the possibility of submitting their civil claim

The applicant’s claim was forwarded to the Ministry of Finance. The latter’s submissions in reply were not communicated to the applicant. 8.

    On 27 February 2013 the Administrative and Tax Court of Mirandela dismissed the first applicant’s claim.

suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller Le CORROLLER, les observations de la société civile professionnelle BORE, Xavier et BORE, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

sur les procédures ouvertes en application des articles L.342-7, L. 342-12, L. 743-11 et L. 743-21 du code d'entrée et de séjour des étrangers en France et du droit d'asile, Assistée de Charlotte COMBAL

sur les procédures ouvertes en application des articles L.342-7, L. 342-12, L. 743-11 et L. 743-21 du code d'entrée et de séjour des étrangers en France et du droit d'asile, Assistée de Charlotte COMBAL

Moreover, the applicant’s claim of indirect discrimination based on age had not been substantiated.

COTE D'AZUR Intimés ORDONNANCE D'INCIDENT Nous, Cathy CESARO-PAUTROT, magistrate de la mise en état de la Chambre 1-3 de la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, assistée de Charlotte COMBARET

On that basis the applicant considered that she had been discriminated against on two counts: discrimination on grounds of sex as compared to her husband and discrimination as compared to members of the

of one spouse against the other with an automatic claim against the body responsible for paying out the pension.

    On 8 September 2005 the Regional Directorate refused the applicant’s claim. It pointed out that, in the light of the relevant provisions of Act no.

ALEXANDRE PANART, avocat au barreau de TOULOUSE INTIMES Monsieur [D] [V] 20 RUE DE BOURRASOL APPT D05 31300 TOULOUSE représenté par Me Robert François RASTOUL de la SCP RASTOUL FONTANIER COMBAREL

  France judgment ([GC], 22689/07, 13   December 2012, Information Note   158 ), compared with the judgments in Čonka and Hirsi Jamaa and Others, cited above, led the Court to the following

It concluded that a   reorganisation would result in all groups of creditors receiving a higher proportion of their claims compared with alternative solutions. 8.

    Relevant domestic law Section 6 of the Media Act provides for the strict liability of the publisher in cases of defamation; the victim can thus claim damages from him.