CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-84539
25 octobre 2000
honoraires chargées de mener à terme les affaires civiles pendantes depuis mai 1995, une augmentation importante des effectifs des juges et du personnel administratif et deux importantes résolutions du Consiglio
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4792
18 février 1999
On 18 June 1993 the applicants, who had been elected to the San Marinese parliament (the Consiglio Grande e Generale ), took their oath of office in writing, omitting the reference to the Gospels required
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD000379522
15 mai 2025
    On 9 October 2020 the applicant lodged an appeal against the TAR’s decision with the Consiglio di Stato .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD001402588
7 août 1996
  As the Municipality failed to comply with the latter decision, the applicants instituted proceedings in the Consiglio di Stato .   18.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0706DEC001125184
6 juillet 1988
Procédure disciplinaire           Par décision du 22 décembre 1982, déposée au Secrétariat le 3 février 1983, le Conseil de l'Ordre des Avocats de Reggio Calabria (Consiglio
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0704DEC004438598
4 juillet 2000
36.7pt; display:inline-block } .sAABE89E6 { width:289.84pt; display:inline-block } PREMIÈRE SECTION   DÉCISION   SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ   de la requête n° 44385/98 présentée par Faustino Cornaglia
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-68780-69248
    Le 18 juin 1993, les requérants, élus au Parlement («   Consiglio Grande e Generale   »), prêtèrent serment par écrit sans toutefois se référer aux Evangiles, comme prescrit par
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0712DEC001293087
12 juillet 1989
. ___________   (1)      La "Giunta regionale" est l'organe exécutif du conseil         régional "Consiglio Regionale" élu au suffrage universel
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0802JUD003771097
2 août 2001
    In a decision of 28 February 1992 the Consiglio di Stato dismissed the Pomezia District Council’s appeal and upheld the impugned decision. 22.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68468-68936
5 janvier 2000
Thus the Consiglio di Stato had held that the exercise by the Ministry of its right of pre-emption fell into the category of expropriation measures and that in this case the administrative authorities
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC002833795
16 avril 1998
désigne le président. »          (Italien)        « Se è ricusato l'intero Tribunale, il presidente ne dà      avviso al Consiglio
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002487794
16 octobre 1996
xa0;     by Alfredo CASOTTI, Adolfo FLORIO                       and the CONSIGLIO
ECLI:CEDH:002-592
18 mars 2011
The applicant’s claim was dismissed by a decision upheld at final instance by the Consiglio di Stato .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117DEC003434609
17 novembre 2016
06/2016   59629/10 30/09/2010 Maria Teresa CECINELLI 08/08/1951 Terni 08/06/2016   59658/10 06/10/2010 Annamaria MANUPPELLI 10/05/1946 Naples 20/06/2016   23373/11 25/01/2011 Gaetano CONSIGLIO
ECLI:CEDH:002-7010
30 mai 2000
Law : Article 1 of Protocol No. 1   – as a result of the judgment of the Consiglio di Stato applying the constructive-expropriation rule the applicants had been deprived of the possibility of obtaining
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0919DEC001393523
19 septembre 2024
The applicant’s complaint under Article 10 of the Convention concerning a decision by the San Marino Parliament ( Consiglio Grande e Generale ) mandating the Government to launch an investigation, with
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233478
5 avril 2024
into a mafia-style murder opened against unknown perpetrators, national authorities found by wiretapping the telephone line of P.R.P., brother of the murder victim, that he was seeking “advice” ( consigli
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0318JUD003081406
In its judgment (no. 556) dated 13 April 2006 the Consiglio di Stato gave the following reasoning: “... the Constitutional Court has accepted on a number of occasions that secularism is a supreme principle
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC003029015
16 janvier 2018
’infermità derivatane agli aventi diritto e, in caso di pari entità, secondo l’ordine del disagio economico, accertato con le modalità previste dal regolamento di cui al decreto del Presidente del Consiglio
ECLI:CEDH:003-738641-750445
24 avril 2003
The latter paragraph was the subject matter of interpretation by the Italian courts in the form of opinions of the Consiglio del Stato or decisions of the ordinary and constitutional courts.
Page 28 sur 38
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.