CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49861
19 mars 1997
} .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD227234A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68156-68624
7 mars 2000
} .s4598CDF { width:70.9pt; display:inline-block } .sB70F9E4 { width:1.1pt; display:inline-block } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .s94407937 { width:17.3pt; display:inline-block } .s50C1C01D
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1022JUD002127902
22 octobre 2007
; display:inline-block } .sDFAFD13E { width:71.82pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sE9B40630 { width:19.85pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s589F1A46 { width:25.5pt; text-indent:0pt
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC006867301
2 septembre 2004
} .s7C119006 { width:5.02pt; display:inline-block } .s61E420C2 { font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s93087BA9 { width:10.98pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404DEC004408102
4 avril 2006
ECLI:CEDH:001-51168
9 février 1996
{ font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0510DEC002163415
10 mai 2016
text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CEDH:003-1490018-1564115
27 octobre 2005
} .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s9626925F { width:84.51pt; display:inline-block } .s8298851C { width:152.11pt; display:inline-block } .s767CD18C { width:78.73pt; display:inline-block
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-953121-982233
11 mars 2004
{ font-family:Arial; font-variant:small-caps } .s69BE285C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:85.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-85.05pt } .s9A223E1B { width:11.03pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CEDH:003-1563545-1644907
26 janvier 2006
} .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s8E60B1BA { width:66.03pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6A2FE81 { width:23.28pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CEDH:003-870184-892957
6 novembre 2003
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s94935B0F { width:389.85pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC003198196
7 septembre 1999
} .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sBA8DCCFC { width:35.45pt; display:inline-block } .s7137FEF8 { width:15.02pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC002097918
21 octobre 2021
vertical-align:super } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CEDH:003-1824544-1925265
2 novembre 2006
; display:inline-block } .s30F0174A { width:50.16pt; display:inline-block } .s25786498 { width:108.79pt; display:inline-block } .sDE1F8FF9 { width:337.58pt; display:inline-block } .sB36E8B53 { width:142.14pt
ECLI:CEDH:003-765467-779742
3 juin 2003
} .s8FA386DE { width:104.11pt; display:inline-block } .s2E0AB1BE { width:103.44pt; display:inline-block } .sCBF5CFC1 { width:16.17pt; display:inline-block } .s200DC2BD { width:196.86pt; display:inline-block
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002483994
19 février 1998
} .sA650627 { width:29.82pt; display:inline-block } .sADFBB2FF { width:7.13pt; display:inline-block } .sB0A58623 { width:23.81pt; display:inline-block } .s84D0D60A { width:8.36pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC007428701
26 septembre 2002
text-align:center } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309DEC004208110
9 mars 2021
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-549383-551172
14 mai 2002
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s94935B0F { width:389.85pt; display:inline-block
1ère et 4ème chambres réunies
ECLI:FR:CECHR:2024:475093.20241016
16 octobre 2024
Mathieu Le Coq, rapporteur public ; La parole ayant été donnée, après les conclusions, à la SCP Gury, Maître, avocat de la société Immobilière Abraham Bloch et à la SCP L.
Page 3 sur 30