CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0831DEC000483307
31 août 2010
} .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0331DEC003382505
31 mars 2009
} .s1DA5892 { width:153.05pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 33825
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212DEC006943210
12 février 2013
} .sC7BF4101 { width:166.26pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC003115607
18 novembre 2008
} .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 31156
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC001870502
15 juin 2010
} .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 18705
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217DEC004090209
17 décembre 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117DEC004125509
17 novembre 2016
} .sAA2523D7 { width:201.43pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC006009109
29 juin 2010
} .sF8483829 { width:141.19pt; display:inline-block } .s2BF264A { width:20.43pt; display:inline-block } .s85D0C50 { width:184.53pt; display:inline-block } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC003137724
5 février 2026
vertical-align:super } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607DEC001486315
7 juin 2018
vertical-align:super } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914DEC002601116
14 septembre 2023
} .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109DEC007341817
9 novembre 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012DEC002411816
12 octobre 2023
} .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .s8D17D8A5 { width:127.42pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC007338817
14 décembre 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215DEC007834416
15 février 2024
} .sF920FE69 { font-family:Arial; color:#f8f8f8 } .s69DCC830 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sC646A315 { width:14.54pt; display:inline-block } .sB3159364 { width:123.42pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012DEC003241516
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002475594
23 septembre 1998
} .s17F22A1 { width:8.71pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sBF03EFEA { width:34.53pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s329E798F { width:137.93pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC000125906
15 novembre 2011
Accordingly, they should be struck out of the list. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1129DEC001257904
29 novembre 2018
} .sCF589882 { width:157.77pt; display:inline-block } .sC30055DD { width:0.44pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207DEC004002905
7 décembre 2010
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Page 34 sur 451