In the case of Mitchell and Holloway v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   J.-P.

Elle renvoie à cet égard à la jurisprudence constante des organes de la Convention (voir, par exemple, l’arrêt Barbera, Messegué et Jabardo c.

25999/09 28/04/2009 Gina ROSSI 23/10/1958 Rome   Domenica GIACOPELLI 09/02/1958 Palerme   Roberta KOHLSCWITTER 15/06/1958 Rome Ferdinando Emilio ABBATE   26007/09 28/04/2009 Saverio Michele

Michael Triantafyllides, Attorney General of the Republic,                         

          Pour le requérant         - Me Michel Forges, avocat au barreau de Bruxelles.   11.

  :   Josep Casadevall, président ,   Nicolas Bratza,   Giovanni Bonello,   Matti Pellonpää,   Kristaq Traja,   Ljiljana Mijović,   Ján Šikuta, juges , et de Michael

should not start with the preconceived idea that the accused has committed the offence charged; the burden of proof is on the prosecution, and any doubt should benefit the accused (see, inter alia, the Barberà

The Court therefore finds that the applicant has not exhausted the available domestic remedies on this issue (see the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no.

Italy , judgment of   25 June 1987, Series A no. 119, p. 11, § 25; Mitchell and Holloway v. the United Kingdom , no. 44808/98, judgment of 17 December 2002).

DU POT DE LA METAIRIE, prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 12] [Localité 6] Représentée par Me Céline BARBEREAU, substituant Me Nathalie

Belgique du 10 mars 1972 ( article 50 ), série A n o 14, pp. 8-9, § 16, et Barberà, Messegué et Jabardo c.   Espagne du 13 juin 1994 ( article 50 ), série A n o 285-C, p. 57, § 17).

La Cour renvoie à cet égard à la jurisprudence constante des organes de la Convention (voir, par exemple, l’arrêt Barbera, Messegué et Jabardo c.

Riou, président-rapporteur, - les conclusions de Mme Michel, rapporteure publique ; - les observations de Me Barbereau, substituant Me Chiffert, représentant le centre hospitalier de Montreuil-sur-Mer

the Court recalls that its case-law establishes that there must be a clear causal connection between the violation of the Convention established and the damage claimed by the applicant (for example, Barberà

Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a United Kingdom national, Michael

Spain judgment of 21   January 1999, Reports 1999-1, § 28 and the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 6   December 1988, Series A no. 146, p. 31, §   68).

Polybius describes Macedonia as a ‘shield’ and praises the Macedonians because they fought the barbarians (non-Greeks) to ensure the safety of the (other) Greeks (Polybius, Historiae , Leipzig edition,

Belgium judgment of 10 March 1972 ( Article 50 ), Series A no. 14, pp. 8-9, § 16, and the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v.

applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in the appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings or other sources of income (see, amongst other authorities, Barberà