CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313DEC003528516
13 mars 2018
    The Court notes that the Federal Constitutional Court found the applicant’s constitutional complaint to be inadmissible without, however, indicating with which admissibility requirement the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0607DEC002067215
7 juin 2016
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13721
7 juin 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607DEC003046413
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-12204
16 octobre 2018
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies
ECLI:CEDH:002-12229
6 novembre 2018
ECLI:CEDH:002-12073
ECLI:CEDH:002-13009
20 octobre 2020
ECLI:CEDH:002-12650
8 octobre 2019
ECLI:CEDH:002-12666
5 novembre 2019
ECLI:CEDH:002-13700
24 mai 2022
ECLI:CEDH:002-13722
ECLI:CEDH:002-13358
22 juin 2021
ECLI:CEDH:002-14438
4 février 2025
ECLI:CEDH:002-11330
5 juillet 2016
ECLI:CEDH:002-13615
8 mars 2022
(b) Admissibility (exhaustion of domestic remedies) – Article 569 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure laid down specific procedural steps that had to be followed for submitting supplementary grounds to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC007150613
THE LAW Admissibility 1.     Submissions by the parties 49.     The Government argued that the applicant had not exhausted the domestic remedies.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13616
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC002881112
ECLI:CEDH:002-14011
24 janvier 2023
Page 9 sur 1885