CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Tribunal Administratif de Paris
ORTA_2221726_20221020
20 octobre 2022
B E A, représenté par Me Wise, demande au juge des référés, saisi sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-2 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d'enjoindre au préfet de police de Paris de le convoquer
Page 9 sur 154
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4731
18 septembre 2003
France (dec.) - 44568/98 Decision 18.9.2003 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for home Alleged infringement of “home” due to entry of police officers into a restaurant: inadmissible The applicants
Tribunal Administratif de Nice
DTA_2402582_20240606
6 juin 2024
Par un mémoire enregistré le 4 juin 2024, les sociétés Bouygues Telecom et Cellnex France Infrastructures ont déclaré se désister de leur requête.
1ère Chambre
69e9b013cdc6046d47382295
21 avril 2026
Monsieur Philippe MAUREL et Mme Anne-Sophie WILLM, Conseillers. M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128DEC002041507
28 janvier 2014
The Court notes that no heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the applications on behalf of the deceased applicants.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55593
21 septembre 1994
whether there had also been a breach of Article 8 (art. 8) taken alone; - held, unanimously, that Switzerland was to pay the applicant, within three months, 20 000 Swiss francs
65a8d15de12c85000874ae25
16 janvier 2024
Mme Florence DOMENEGO et Madame Anne-Sophie WILLM, Conseillers. Greffier : Mme Fabienne ARNOUX, Greffier, lors des débats et du prononcé de la décision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0228DEC004839312
28 février 2023
The applicant did not appear either at the hearing on 24 January 2008, but instead again submitted a written statement that he did not wish to participate in the hearing on account of his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0702DEC004768707
2 juillet 2013
France , no. 10828/84, Commission decision of 6 October 1988, D.R. No. 57, p. 18); (c) whether the applicant’s heirs had an interest of their own (see Armonienė v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD003132207
20 janvier 2011
Where the perpetrator acts through negligence, the term of imprisonment shall be up to six months or the fine up to 100,000 francs.” 28.
4ème Chambre
69df1f78cdc6046d4747bace
14 avril 2026
La SARL Chenet Design Architecture et la SA Axa France Iard ont relevé appel de cette décision le 19 janvier 2026.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49540
7 juin 1995
was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 40 000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 27 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum
Tribunal Administratif d'Amiens
DTA_2502227_20250624
24 juin 2025
Q..., à la société d’aménagement foncier et d’établissement rural Hauts-de-France et à M. P... V..., expert.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250319
28 avril 2026
The emails indicated, inter alia, that Judge L.S.’ wish to be recused due to her personal (subjective) bias as well as the appearance of bias, should not be included in the decision dismissing the request
DTA_2400793_20250115
15 janvier 2025
projet ; - les dimensions de l'accès sur la voie publique étaient suffisantes et la délivrance du permis de construire aurait pu être assortie de prescriptions ; - l'Architecte des Bâtiments de France
ECLI:CEDH:002-13802
4 octobre 2022
his mother in the last moments of her life and his mother’s right to respect for her wishes and her personal autonomy.
ECLI:CEDH:001-52288
21 octobre 2002
in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and 12 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 194 800 French francs, and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0927DEC003679797
27 septembre 2001
this wish and want to decide themselves.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD006492701
16 décembre 2003
Finally, numerous other witness statements testified to the children's expressed wish not to return to Spain.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC000052216
21 janvier 2021
The Court has also established that it is for the heir who wishes to pursue the proceedings before the Court to substantiate his or her standing to do so (see, for example, Belskiy v.