{ margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCB3AE0DD { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sEB3BBCD6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt;

margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s6BBACBD8 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .sEEE3CE35 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom

} .s5243C837 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; font-size:10pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid

margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sEEE3CE35 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt

D’après les informations figurant au dossier, la procédure est toujours pendante. B.

Or, le droit de publier des informations ne pouvait pas selon le tribunal s’étendre aux informations trompeuses et dépeintes de telle sorte que leurs destinataires reçoivent finalement une information

    By a letter of 17 April 2008 the Government notified the Court that the parties had reached a friendly settlement.

{ margin-top:14pt; margin-left:15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:3.45pt; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s5C5C410E

:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7BE5FA78 { margin-top

By letter dated 9 September 2011 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issue raised by the application.

:10pt } .sCD71EA34 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sCA92750 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left

:-0.1pt } .sB90861A5 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s2487DA34 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; letter-spacing:-0.1pt; vertical-align:super } .sF7EA9B01 { margin-top

margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:-15.05pt } .s48F37204 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:8.8pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s776E10E7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .

} .s3C0142D3 { margin-top:30pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing

:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBD4F1DF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:8.75pt;

On 16 June 2003 the Poznań District Prosecutor replied to the applicant’s letters in which he had complained about the delay in the investigation against him and the lack of information about his case.

.) ; qu'à l'appui de sa demande il fait valoir que c'est sur la base d'information erronée qu'il a formulé sa proposition d'achat ; qu'il expose que Maître Y... lui a communiqué des informations erronées

:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt } .s21DA24D5 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:-17.6pt } .sB90861A5 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s13F94BDE