(art. 15) de la Convention.

       3) Durée de la garde à vue (article 5 par. 3 (art. 5-3))        Le Gouvernement défendeur excipe d'emblée de l'article 15 (art. 15) de la Convention

. 5, art. 6, art. 8, art. 9, art. 10, art. 11, art. 13, art. 14) de la Convention et qu'il n'avait pas démontré que les conditions prévues à l'article 15 (art. 15) de la Convention pour des mesures de

. 32-1), de la Convention s'est écoulé sans que l'affaire ait été déférée à la Cour européenne des Droits de l'Homme en application de l'article 48 (art. 48) de la Convention;      

Turquie au titre de l'article 15 (art. 15) de la Convention.

       3) Durée de la garde à vue (article 5 par. 3 (art. 5-3))        Le Gouvernement défendeur excipe d'emblée de l'article 15 (art. 15) de la Convention

(art. 15) of the European Convention on Human Rights,   Decides, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of the United Kingdom, to discontinue its examination of the

(art. 5, art. 6, art. 8, art. 9, art. 10, art. 11, art. 13, art. 14) and that it had failed to show that the conditions set out in Article 15 (art. 15) of the Convention for measures of derogation were

. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;      &#

. 5) to enable the continued use of the Prevention of Terrorism legislation, did not comply with Article 15 (Art. 15) of the Convention.

Court H.R., Brogan and Others judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B), the United Kingdom has lodged a derogation under Article 15 (Art. 15) of the Convention and has failed to repeal Section

Court H.R., Brogan and Others judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B), the United Kingdom has lodged a derogation under Article 15 (Art. 15) of the Convention and has failed to repeal Section

Court H.R., Brogan and Others judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B), the United Kingdom has lodged a derogation under Article 15 (Art. 15) of the Convention and has failed to repeal Section

Court H.R., Brogan and Others judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B), the United Kingdom has lodged a derogation under Article 15 (Art. 15) of the Convention and has failed to repeal Section

(Art. 15) of the Convention.

(Art. 15) of the Convention will be dealt with later in the present decision;   Whereas the Commission was established under Article 19 (Art. 19) of the Convention with the task to ensure, together

     L'article 8 (art. 8) de la Convention se lit ainsi :        " 1.

5) of the Convention in view of the United Kingdom’s derogation of 23 December 1988 under Article 15 (art. 15) of the Convention; (b) unanimously, that no separate issue arose under Article 13 (art. 13

       The respondent Government base their first objection on Article 15 (Art. 15) of the Convention.