, Mr Ali Tatlı (“the applicant”), on 23 May 2019; the decision to give notice to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) of the complaint concerning Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and to declare the

6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 549th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 17 November 1995, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with

3727/18 09/01/2018 Mykhaylo Ivanovych LEVADNYY 1955 Sergiy Mykolayovych KLOPKOV Art. 6 (1) - limitations on access to a court 14/01/2025 (by eComms - downloaded) 02/05/2025 (by eComms – not downloaded

      ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

Suède (n° 2) - 18928/91 Arrêt 23.2.1994 Article 6 Article 6-1 Procès public Procès oral Refus de la Cour suprême administrative de tenir audience   : violation [Ce sommaire est tiré du recueil officiel

575, alinéa 2, 1° du Code de procédure pénale ; Vu le mémoire personnel produit ; Sur le moyen unique de cassation pris de la violation des articles 1er, 6-1, 86, 591 et 593 du Code de procédure

cassation

rejet

Accordingly, there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention. II.   ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 §§ 1 AND 3 OF THE CONVENTION 20.

  THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 ( b ) OF THE CONVENTION 5.

6 paragraph 1) (see details in Appendix);   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article  

They raise an issue of access to court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.       QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 21.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 AND ARTICLE   13 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

a confirmé l'ordonnance de refus d'informer sur le fondement de l'article 6-1 du Code de procédure pénale ; "aux motifs qu'aux termes de la plainte et du mémoire qui font état de commissions rogatoires

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Slovak Government (“the Government”).

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of criminal proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 6.     The applicants complained of the lack of access to a court with regard to decisions by the CJP.

Les griefs que les requérants tiraient de l’article   6 § 1 de la Convention (inexécution ou exécution tardive de décisions de justice internes) ont été communiqués au gouvernement italien («